Docked or Natural Tail?
My choice is FREEDOM of CHOICE.

I find it amazing that some folks think leaving the tail changes structure!!
I am Loren Chiever, this is my web site, and my opinions, it is not intended for any purpose except to voice my views.

UPDATE 11/15/11
The ARC Board of Directors has approved a proposed change to the Standard, it is to be published in the next ARK Newsletter to read this proposal go to;
http://www.amrottclub.org/2011/Tail_Standard_Revision_11-11.pdf
I have owned Rottweilers for close to 25 years, and in 2000 I imported a tailed male from Germany. I intended to show him but due to misfortune he did not turn out to be a show dog, not because of his tail, but because of an injury.
When I bought him this is what I wrote:
A little tail commentary from Loren: It is really different to have a puppy with a tail. It makes it very easy to read his thoughts, when he is into something new he tucks the tail between his legs, as he gets accustomed to it the tail moves up and begins to wag, there does not seem to be the fanny wiggle, but the tail sure gets going. Like I stated above it makes it real easy to tell when he is going to the bathroom, or looking for a place to go as the nose goes down the tail goes up.
I know it is a major concern of many people that Germany does not allow tail to be docked. Many people believe that it ruins the appearance of the dog. I for one find the tail different but something I could live with. It does not change the attitude of the puppy, nor do I think it changes the structure that makes him what he is, it just gives a tail that is a signal device for the dog.
It is a shame that Germany had to change the standard to satisfy the laws of their land. But it is also a shame that I can not import a puppy from Germany, from the breeder and breeding of my choice, and keep the tail on him and compete in the American show ring on an even keel with the docked dogs.
The politics of the Government of one Country and the politics of the dog community in another force me to make a decision, one do I keep the tail on my dog, keep him as a pet, never show him and expect to win, show him in AKC and listen to the gossip and criticism, and show him once or twice a year in a USRC show. Or do I dock his tail, cause him how much pain I do not know, just so I can please the American show people, and give up my chance to show him in USRC shows or the chance to take him back to Germany and show him if I should so choose.
In my opinion, it is a shame that the politics of either side get in the way of us enjoying our dogs, and keeping them healthy and happy, I would love to be able to keep my puppy the way I got him, I could very easily learn to live with the tail, and I find it attractive already. But so I can conform to the rules of the governing body of the dog game I want to play I will have to dock my dog, not for any other reason but so I feel I have as good a chance of winning as any other person does. Talk about dumb rules, how about this for a "DUMB REASON" to dock my puppy, "SO I HAVE AS GOOD OF A CHANCE' to win as any other person has.
We can talk about government interference all we want to, but as long as the people like me are willing to go against what we believe just to please the masses, we don't need the government to tell us what to and what not to do. WE can do as we want, and still not do things right.
Here is the link to pictures and my comments in 2000,
http://www.hollyhouserottweilers.com/quint.htm
AKC Board passed a New Judges guide line in April 2011 that States:
Individual Examination of Dogs
Judges are expected to examine and gait every dog in the same objective, breed-specific manner even if a poor specimen may clearly be out of the ribbons. This includes breeds that according to their breed standard traditionally have been cropped and/or docked and dogs entered which may have deviations from the breed standard. Approach dogs calmly. Examine each with a gentle but sure touch and no sudden, surprising moves.To see the official Minutes of the April AKC Board meeting go to this Page:
The ARC Board at their May 2011 Board meeting voted
to not allow this information to be part of the package presented to new judges that they mentor: 5.4-5/25: Motion to approve adding to all Judge's education materials for the American Rottweiler Club the attached guidelines and comments from the American Kennel Club,
to replace material or
references that are in conflict with
such AKC policies.
Motion & Call the Question: Jeff Shaver;
Second: Jim Runck.
Approved: JR, LB, JS; Disapprove: LC,
AG, JG, MP, JF; Did not Vote: SL Failed:
5/28/11
To see the official minutes of the April ARC Board meeting go to this page: http://amrottclub.org/2011/ARC_Board_Motions_May_2011.pdf
For Sieger shows that ARC sanctions, like the one the day after the ARC National this year in Pennsylvania,this description of a tailed dog is used as a judges guideline:
http://www.arcsiegershow.com/tail_standard.pdf
FCI/ADRK ROTTWEILER TAIL STANDARD
http://www.adrk.de/5_standard_e.htm
Copied from the ADRK Web Page:
Tail: In natural condition,
level in extension of the upper line; at ease may be hanging
Faults:
Tail: Set on too high or too low.
Eliminating Faults:
Tail: Kink tail, ring tail, with strong lateral deviation
http://www.adrk.de/5_rutenhaltung_e.htm
Even though this description and similar picture is approved by the ARC board, and membership
to be used at ARC sanctioned events that are called Sieger shows, they refuse to change
the Standard that is approved by AKC to include the same description, so that Judges
that are required to judge Rottweilers with tails have a description to follow.
Even though there is no description of the tail in the standard, and no fault listed for
a natural tail, many judges have in the past dismissed tailed dogs due to lack of merit,
or because they do not conform to the Standard as written, But there have also been
many judges that have awarded tailed dogs points, majors, and have judged them
on equal grounds enough that these dogs have earned an AKC Championship.
V-1, AKC CH, Can CH Friendly Dutch Ijsven AD, CGC
American Champion
International, Austrian, DT.VDH, ADRK Champion 2008 IFR
World Sieger & Best in Show
2006 ADRK KlubSieger 2008 Hungarian KlubSieger 2011 SARK Sieger,
2010 USRC Southeast Regional Sieger
2007 Swiss KlubSieger, 2005 & 2007 Austrian KlubSieger
2005 BundesSieger, 2005 EuropaSieger
DJUKE vom Vilstaler Land SchH III, AD, ZtP, BH, TT, CGC, RTD
|
AKC CH KARTHAGO vom Vilstaler Land
These dogs have earned AKC Points:
NIRK Grand National
Sieger and Best in
Show 2010
Canadian
Champion
Deutscher Champion ADRK, Internationaler Champion, Deutscher VDH Champion USRC NS'09 Herbie vom Gruntenblick BH ZtP AD SchH III
June 27, 2010
EIFELSHOW BG BLATZHEIM
Germany CH Hugo van het Falconsnest
Hugo finished his AKC Championship in Michigan November 12, 2011
QUECKE VOM HAUSE ANIN Had both majors and 7 points before her untimely death.
and I am sure there are others that have earned points because of the quality they are.
A Sad Side Note: Through all of this battle there have been several tailed dogs that have been imported, and their owners decided to do an adult amputation of their tail so they could be shown in the AKC ring and win. Some were shown a few times and then we did not see them again, and some went ahead to become AKC Champions, but either way, they had to go through cosmetic surgery to avoid the stigma of having a tail, and so the owners could win a ribbon.
I am curious what all the battle and cries against tails are, when these dogs have all ready fulfilled the requirements to earn an AKC Championship, or have earned points toward their Championship with the standard written as it is. What harm has been done to the breed because these dogs have earned points, and what harm will be done if other tailed dogs follow in their footsteps?
It seem sad to me that so many people spend so much time worrying about a few tailed dogs entering a show ring, and so little time worrying about what laws are being passed in many states, counties and cities to outlaw even owning a Rottweiler. I guess the concern is that even though they can not own the dog of their choice, at least if they could own it, it would be docked. Makes sense to me.
I received these comments from Danielle Green, a long time Rottweiler breeder and handler and thought they should be shared:
Another point is that showing
dogs is to evaluate them for breeding stock, That is the
purpose of the AKC shows and any other show. to not be
able to show the tailed dog is a limit our gene pool. Not
smart at this time with all the Danielle
Here is a link to a place where you can express you opinion on this issue, I don't care which side you are on, your opinion has the same importance as mine, the only thing is I will moderate the opinions, and any that attack any person or dog will not be posted, and I ask that you include you name and e-mail address, as I have included my name and my e-mail address so I can be contacted about my opinions, I am willing to put my name on my opinion, and I think anyone else should be willing to put their name on theirs. Loren Chiever Click to e-mail me. |
Click on logo to go to my Homepage: